Nexus market mirrors
nexusb2l7fmqnefwphyy7m5zjhlkytlbo7qbb5lu5dlczr3azgii2gyd.onionnexusma2iegzo7atzwbrwxhcdopyri3vare2twibldnlc3txqjdeb5yd.onionnexusabcdpvtnivv6owtqjkvd22k5x3hlpofkgjqjmgzltlde6mwe2qd.onionPublished as supplied. Nothing here is monitored, so this is not a claim that any of them opens right now.
Withdrawing a dispute
Two situations wear the same words. In one, withdrawing is obviously right. In the other it is the same mistake as releasing early, arriving a fortnight later and dressed up as fairness.
The two situations
| Why you are withdrawing | Whether it is sensible |
|---|---|
| It arrived | Yes. Withdraw and say so plainly |
| They refunded inside the order | Yes, once it is actually credited |
| They promised to sort it if you withdraw | No. That is the request with no process behind it |
| You are tired of it | Understandable, and you are giving up a live claim |
Confirm before you write
- Money credited, not promised. Check the balance, not the message.
- The item is here, not sent. Dispatched is a word somebody typed.
- Nothing is conditional on withdrawing first. If it is, that is the answer.
I will withdraw it now, they have said they will sort it out with me directly once its closed and I would rather resolve it that way, seems fairer to them.
Withdrawing. It arrived this morning, dated today. Nothing outstanding from my side.
The weak one closes the only mechanism in exchange for a promise made outside it, which is exactly the trade the whole site warns about. The strong one states the reason as a fact that already happened, which is the only kind of reason that makes a withdrawal safe.
No second attempt
A withdrawal is generally final. This is one of the actions where being wrong cannot be repaired later, so the check happens before the message rather than after the reply.
Why it cannot be taken back
A withdrawal generally ends the case rather than pausing it. There is no second filing on the same order, because the event that justified the first one has already been ruled on by you closing it. That puts this in the same small group as releasing funds early and sending a payment, where the check has to happen before the message rather than after the reply.
The trade being offered
Close the only mechanism that can move the money, in exchange for a promise from the party the money would move away from. Written out like that nobody would take it, which is why it never arrives written out like that. It arrives as fairness, or as not wanting to cause trouble for somebody who has been decent.
What to check before writing
- Look at the balance, not the message. Credited and promised are different words.
- Look at the item, not the status. Dispatched is something somebody typed.
- Ask whether anything is conditional on withdrawing first. If it is, that is your answer.